Sheppard, White, Kachergus, & DeMaggio, P.A. Attorneys & Counselors At Law
Call us anytime.
During office hours, call 904-356-9661
After office hours, call 904-727-7191

Regular office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.

"Lack of Remorse" Cannot be Used to Aggravate a Sentence Imposed Under the State Sentencing Guidelines

An issue which frequently arises at a criminal sentencing hearing is whether or not the defendant has shown "remorse." It has been our experience that most individuals charged with an offense are, in fact, remorseful. If a person elects to require the State to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt at a trial, however, the State often argues the defendant has failed to exhibit the appropriate level of remorse. It then uses the defendant's exercise of the constitutional right to trial as a way to impose a greater sentence if the defendant is convicted. 

In Dinkines v. State, ___ So.3d ___, 38 FLW D2050 (Fla. 4th DCA September 25, 2013), the Court reversed the defendant's prison sentence because the trial court improperly considered lack of remorse as an aggravating sentencing factor. In doing so, the court specifically held, "...[T]he trial court clearly took Dinkines' perceived lack of sincere remorse into consideration. This constitutes reversible error." The appellate court noted that remorse can be a consideration in determining whether to mitigate (or lessen) an individual's sentence under the state sentencing guidelines. It does not have the authority to use lack of remorse to enhance a sentence because such consideration would violate the person's constitutional right to due process.

The appellate court also held that the trial court committed error when it considered other alleged crimes for which the defendant was acquitted, concluding, "[I]t is a violation of due process for the court to rely on conduct of which the defendant has actually been acquitted when imposing a sentence." It should be noted that this was a state criminal proceeding. An entirely different result could have been reached had this been a criminal prosecution in federal court.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
email us for a response
  1. Best Lawyers Best Law Firms US News 2020 Martindale Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Rated for highest level of Provisional Excellence 2020 Sheppard Best Lawyers Badge Employment 2019 Sheppard Best Lawyers Badge General Practice 2019 Best Lawyers Best Law Firms US News 2018 Best Lawyers|Lawyer Of The Year WM. J. Sheppard|Criminal Defense: White-Collor|Jacksonville Florida|2018
  2. Best Lawyers Best Law Firms US News 2017 Best Lawyers|Best Law Firms US News|Criminal Defense: White-Collor|Tier 1|Jacksonville|2017 Martindale-Hubbell Client Champion Silver / 2017 Best Lawyers Best Law Firms US News 2016 Martindale Hubbell AV Preeminent peer rated for high professional achievement 2020 William J.Sheppard Best Lawyers Lawyer of the year 2014
  3. American College of Trial Lawyers The Florida Bar Board Certified Best Lawyers Linking Lawyers And Clients Worldwide AV Martindale Hubbell Peer Review Rated For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability Super Lawyers

Sheppard, White, Kachergus, & DeMaggio, P.A. Attorneys & Counselors at Law.
215 N. Washington Street
Jacksonville, FL 32202

Phone: 904-727-7191
Phone: 904-356-9661
Fax: 904-356-9667
Map & Directions

Regular office hours are 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.

Back to top